Distinctive Representation in Sophisticated Family Law Matters
Published on:

Jurisdiction is the authority of a particular court to hear and rule on a case, and it is a crucial part of any court proceeding. There are multiple types of jurisdiction, such as territorial and subject matter. Territorial jurisdiction refers to a court’s ability to hear cases relating to a certain geographic area. Subject matter jurisdiction determines a court’s authority to hear certain types of cases, like child custody and divorce.

While this may seem straightforward, jurisdiction can easily become a contested issue that can greatly impact the outcome of a case. Continue reading →

Published on:

There are some situations in which a non-parent may be required to pay child support in North Carolina, but there are strict requirements that must be met. In most cases, non-parents are not obligated to pay child support.

A recent Court of Appeals case dealt with this issue, stating that, in the absence of a parental relationship and a formal, written agreement, a non-parent cannot be made to pay child support. Continue reading →

Published on:

North Carolina child support is calculated using various elements like the needs of the child and the custody arrangements, but income is one of the most significant factors in child support determinations. In most cases, the income each parent presently and actually earns is used to calculate support obligations.

However, imputed income is sometimes calculated in select cases. Imputing income occurs when the court uses earning potential to calculate support amounts. Most often, courts impute income when one parent is underemployed or underearning and acts in bad faith to avoid paying support. Continue reading →

Published on:

Equitable distribution is available in North Carolina divorces whenever either party requests it. The court will determine the most equitable division of assets and debts, which is not always an equal split. Determining the most equitable distribution of the spouses’ property involves various factors, including: Continue reading →

Published on:

In civil cases, such as divorces and equitable distribution matters, the defendant must be served with the summons and complaint prior to the date of the hearing. While process servers and the local Sheriff’s department can serve legal documents, you may also be able to serve the opposing party by mail. Continue reading →

Published on:

In a divorce, assets and debts can be divided equally in North Carolina, but if either party requests equitable distribution, then there may also be an unequal division if that’s what the court deems fair. North Carolina courts can use a variety of entities to determine how to divide a couple’s property, including businesses owned by one of the spouses. Continue reading →

Published on:

In a recent case involving trust property in an equitable distribution dispute, the North Carolina Court of Appeals vacated and remanded a trial court’s decision not to add a trust as a necessary party to the case. Continue reading →

Published on:

The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) is a uniform state law that has been enacted by the majority of states, including North Carolina. The UCCJEA establishes subject matter jurisdiction in child custody cases and indicates which court has the authority to decide on a custody issue. Continue reading →

Published on:

Subject matter jurisdiction is the right of a specific court to hear a case and make rulings on the issues. In child custody cases, North Carolina uses the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), which says that jurisdiction can be established in the following ways:

  • Initial child custody jurisdiction
  • Exclusive, continuing jurisdiction
  • Jurisdiction to modify determination
  • Temporary emergency jurisdiction

Jurisdiction can affect child custody, but support issues are also impacted by jurisdictional decisions. Continue reading →

Published on:

Modification of child support may be an option if there has been a material change in circumstances. Parents often use a change in income to justify a recalculation of child support, but this is not always a relevant reason. Continue reading →