Articles Posted in Property Division

Published on:

The phenomenon of “gray divorce” is reshaping the landscape of family law. Couples aged 50 and older increasingly are choosing to end their marriages, often after decades together. This trend, once rare, has become more common as people seek fulfillment in their later years. Continue reading →

Published on:

How to divide marital assets and property is one of the most hotly-contested aspects in divorce proceedings, and the principal of equitable distribution governs the process of this division. While dividing up assets like a house, car, or other tangible property may seem simple enough, there are other assets like a retirement account or trust fund that may be subject to equitable distribution as well. Continue reading →

Published on:

In the intricate world of family law, the equitable distribution of assets during a divorce can often lead to contentious disputes. A notable example is the case of Roberts v. Kyle, Executor of the Estate of Roberts. This case sheds light on the challenges courts face when determining the classification of personal vs. marital property in the context of divorce proceedings. Continue reading →

Published on:

Bankruptcy can complicate family law proceedings, especially when trying to determine what assets will be distributed. Normally, bankruptcy can be used to shield certain properties from being included in divorce proceedings. However, certain types of assets will not be excluded because of one spouse declaring bankruptcy.

If your former partner declares bankruptcy during divorce proceedings, will that preclude you from being able to recover an interest in their pension benefits? Continue reading →

Published on:

When trial courts enter orders in family law matters, such as alimony orders or equitable distribution orders, either party may appeal as long as they meet the requirements. There are various stipulations, such as rules about appealing interlocutory or temporary orders, but the general rule is that orders entered by trial courts are appealable if done at the right time.

Once an appeal has been filed and noted, can the court that entered the appealed order issue other orders in the same matter?

Crowell v. Crowell

Published on:

On a national level, the number of marriages has begun to increase after taking a dive in the couple of years following the COVID-19 pandemic. Even though more people may be getting married now, there are still a significant number of unmarried couples who live together in North Carolina. If you are unmarried, does North Carolina allow a lesser-earning or dependent partner to receive alimony or to seek equitable distribution during a breakup? Continue reading →

Published on:

As part of the North Carolina divorce process, spouses often have assets that need to be divided between them. Equitable distribution is an option if one or both spouses request it, and it is the process by which the court will divide the property in a way that is equitable but not always equal. Continue reading →

Published on:

In a recent case involving trust property in an equitable distribution dispute, the North Carolina Court of Appeals vacated and remanded a trial court’s decision not to add a trust as a necessary party to the case. Continue reading →

Published on:

The language in any contract must be clear and unambiguous, and this standard is true of settlement agreements in divorce proceedings as well. When the terms of an agreement are left open to interpretation, it can lead to issues like contention and litigation. Continue reading →

Published on:

Timeframes and deadlines are a vital part of family law cases, both in trial court and appellate court. Whether filing an answer to a divorce complaint, responding to discovery requests, or objecting to a subpoena, deadlines are a regular part of civil court in North Carolina. In some situations, the consequences for missing a deadline only consist of additional paperwork or a request to the judge. However, there are times when failing to meet a deadline can prevent you from having your case heard, which is what happened in the North Carolina Court of Appeals case of Thiagarajan v. Jaganathan. Continue reading →