Articles Tagged with about law

Published on:

Spouses in North Carolina who are contemplating divorce may consider entering into a separation agreement, and this is a beneficial option for many husbands and wives. What happens if one spouse violates the terms of the agreement? Separation agreements that are not incorporated into a court order are typically subject to the same enforcement rules as other contracts. Continue reading →

Published on:

Court orders cannot typically require nonparties to act. When a court issues an order, the requirements of the order involve only the plaintiff and defendant or the petitioner and respondent. People who are not named in the case cannot generally be ordered to do anything.

If the court determines that someone not named in the case is a necessary party, they may be able to join that person to the case and order them to do or not do something. Stepparents are often central figures in their stepchildren’s lives, making cases like child support more complex. Continue reading →

Published on:

The language in any contract must be clear and unambiguous, and this standard is true of settlement agreements in divorce proceedings as well. When the terms of an agreement are left open to interpretation, it can lead to issues like contention and litigation. Continue reading →

Published on:

Timeframes and deadlines are a vital part of family law cases, both in trial court and appellate court. Whether filing an answer to a divorce complaint, responding to discovery requests, or objecting to a subpoena, deadlines are a regular part of civil court in North Carolina. In some situations, the consequences for missing a deadline only consist of additional paperwork or a request to the judge. However, there are times when failing to meet a deadline can prevent you from having your case heard, which is what happened in the North Carolina Court of Appeals case of Thiagarajan v. Jaganathan. Continue reading →

Published on:

In civil cases, such as child custody proceedings, either party can serve discovery requests on the other party. Discovery is the term used to describe the process of exchanging documents and information. It can include various methods, including interrogatories, requests for production of documents, requests for admission, and depositions.

Parties in child custody cases can use discovery to obtain information relevant to the case, but there are limitations.

Continue reading →

Published on:

North Carolina residents who have lived in the state for at least six months can file for divorce. While separation and divorce are rarely easy, recent moves can make the process even more complicated. Continue reading →

Published on:

North Carolina Statute § 50B-3.1 states that if an emergency or ex parte protective order is issued, and the abuse involves a deadly weapon or threat of a deadly weapon, the abuser must surrender their firearms, ammunition, and firearm permits. Knowing what qualifies as a deadly weapon is important, but making that determination is not always easy. In general terms, a deadly weapon is any object that could cause death or severe harm. Items like guns, knives, baseball bats, and hammers would fall into this category, but what about other everyday items or household objects?

Continue reading →

Published on:

It is common practice for parties in a case to exchange evidence and information. This process is called discovery. There are strict rules and requirements for discovery, and failing to comply with requests from the opposing party may adversely affect your case.

Continue reading →

Published on:

Y Michael Yin, JD

In Nevada, the Supreme Court recently issued a ruling affirming the public’s constitutional right to access Family Court proceedings, overturning a rule change that had closed some hearings. The Court found that the rule violated the First Amendment right to access court proceedings.

In the ruling, the Court acknowledged the importance of protecting litigants’ privacy in family law matters but emphasized that privacy interests do not automatically override the public’s right to access court proceedings. However, some Justices dissented, arguing that Family Court cases should be treated differently from other civil proceedings and pointing to laws regarding confidentiality in adoption and parental rights termination cases.