North Carolina Divorce Lawyers Blog

Articles Posted in LawyerVille

Published on:

By

In this post, we will discuss Icenhour v. Icenhour and how the North Carolina Court of Appeals confirmed a critical principle for all North Carolina alimony modification cases.

We will explain why a change in income alone might not be sufficient to justify modifying the existing alimony amount, and that the party requesting the change bears the strict evidentiary burden to support their position if they want the court to rule in their favor.

Icenhour v. Icenhour – Case Background and Procedural History

Continue reading →
Published on:

By

Family law cases are not decided in theory. They are decided based on real people, real finances, and real evidence. The North Carolina Court of Appeals case Keith v. Keith, 911 S.E.2d 371 (N.C. Ct. App. 2024) is a strong example of how courts evaluate child support when one parent controls their income and how important detailed court findings truly are. Continue reading →

Published on:

By

In this post, we will discuss the implications of the Aguilar v. Mayen case and why the North Carolina Court of Appeals has vacated a custody order. If you are a family lawyer, judge, or a parent in North Carolina, you’ll find this case important, especially from the perspective of how custody orders need to be written to stand. Continue reading →

Published on:

By

In Gallagher-Masonis v. Masonis, 911 S.E.2d 125 (N.C. Ct. App. 2024), the North Carolina Court of Appeals addressed an important question in family law: When can a court review and modify a binding arbitration award involving property division, alimony, and child support? This decision highlights how the North Carolina Family Law Arbitration Act (NCFLAA) interacts with parties’ written agreements and clarifies the extent of judicial oversight in family law arbitration. Continue reading →

Published on:

By

Wasting a court’s time and resources can lead to hefty fines and other penalties for parties who file bad faith complaints. Attorney fees are often awarded in cases where the court determines the plaintiff or other moving party filed their claim in bad faith. Continue reading →

Published on:

By

Courts must have jurisdiction to hear a case. Jurisdiction can be established in numerous ways, including by subject matter or geography. If a party to a case wants to appeal a ruling, the court of appeals must ensure they have appellate jurisdiction, which is the authority to review a lower court’s decision. Interlocutory appeals present unique challenges when determining appellate jurisdiction because there are strict rules concerning the types of orders and judgments that can be appealed, such as whether or not the appealed ruling is considered final. Continue reading →

Published on:

By

All court cases must follow certain rules and processes that dictate how they progress through the system and reach a resolution. Divorce cases must adhere to civil procedure, which includes strict rules regarding elements like pleadings, discovery, hearings, and evidence. Failure to meet any of the requirements of civil procedure could result in evidence being excluded, unfavorable rulings, or even sanctions. Continue reading →

Published on:

By

By Cheri’ Reaves, NCCP

After a deep conversation with a close friend, I felt the need to share something urgent. We were talking about children, technology, and how early they’re being introduced to smartphones, tablets, and social media. This isn’t just about screen time—it’s about real dangers lurking behind those screens. Continue reading →

Published on:

By

Among the most complex issues involved in divorce cases is the distribution of retirement benefits through the entry of Qualified Domestic Relations Orders (QDROs). Retirement plans that are governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) must be divided by QDROs, and alternate payees of such plans can be spouses, ex-spouses, or dependents of the plan participant.

When the participant dies before retirement, their surviving spouse is often the recipient of their retirement benefits. However, distributing funds in these circumstances can quickly become a challenge if there are multiple parties with claims to the funds and there is no QDRO in place. Continue reading →

Published on:

By

In North Carolina, a habitual felon is someone who has been convicted of or pled guilty to three felonies. These defendants may be indicted as habitual felons if they have been designated as such and have been charged with another felony. North Carolina law also states that a defendant may not be prosecuted just to establish them as a habitual felon; there must be an existing felony case that the habitual felon proceeding can accompany. Continue reading →