Articles Tagged with child custody

Published on:

The Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) was enacted to protect the best interests of Native American children and promote the stability of Native families and tribes. It requires that courts make efforts to keep families intact and prioritize putting children in out-of-home placements that are within the child’s family or community. Further, the child’s tribal nation and family have a right to participate in decisions regarding foster placements. Continue reading →

Published on:

There are numerous factors courts must consider when making custody and visitation determinations, but the preeminent factor is the best interest of the child. In some cases, courts may weigh the child’s preference as part of their overall considerations, but this is handled on a case-by-case basis. The child’s age, maturity, and ability to understand the implications of such a decision may impact a court’s willingness to consider the child’s preferences. Continue reading →

Published on:

Wasting a court’s time and resources can lead to hefty fines and other penalties for parties who file bad faith complaints. Attorney fees are often awarded in cases where the court determines the plaintiff or other moving party filed their claim in bad faith. Continue reading →

Published on:

Anyone who suspects that a child is being abused or neglected can make a report to the Department of Social Services or Child Protective Services in North Carolina. This system is intended to protect children and ensure they have safe caregivers and homes. If a report is determined to be unfounded, it means that an investigation found no evidence of the reported neglect or abuse. Continue reading →

Published on:

For unmarried parents, deciding which parent claims the child on their taxes is a common discussion point around the beginning of each year. Some divorce decrees or custody orders include stipulations for which parent can claim the child, but this is not always the case. If you do not have a court-ordered agreement, determining who qualifies for the earned income tax credit is crucial to ensure compliance with federal law. Continue reading →

Published on:

Self-executing modifications are provisions within a contract or order that amend the terms upon a specified event that may occur in the future. The legality of these provisions varies from state to state; some states have determined that self-executing modifications are typically illegal, and others have yet to make any clear or definitive decisions about the legality of such terms.

The North Carolina Court of Appeals case of Madison v. Gonzalez-Madison involved a self-executing modification in a custody order, and the appellate court’s ruling provided clarification on North Carolina’s laws regarding this issue. Continue reading →

Published on:

Courts in North Carolina often enter temporary orders on child custody because time is of the essence in such an important issue. These temporary orders must be followed until the court makes a final ruling, but temporary and permanent orders are handled differently in terms of requesting changes. Is returning to court for a final ruling the only way for an order to become permanent? Continue reading →

Published on:

Legal custody and physical custody are not the same thing. While both are brought up in North Carolina custody cases, they deal with two different aspects of parenting. Physical custody applies to the parent that has the child in their care. Essentially, the parent with whom a child lives most of the time has physical custody. Legal custody carries the right and responsibility to decide on important matters for a child’s welfare and best interest. Continue reading →

Published on:

Parents and guardians who wish to change their child custody order typically must file a motion to modify. Additionally, the parent who files the motion, sometimes referred to as the moving party, must prove that there has been a substantial change in circumstances that impacts the child’s wellbeing.

Can a trial court choose to modify a custody order even when neither parent has filed a motion to modify? Not generally, but a recent Court of Appeals case highlighted a specific scenario in which this might occur. Continue reading →

Published on:

North Carolina law states that custody of a child may be granted jointly to both parents or exclusively to one parent, but how is that decision made in custody cases? All North Carolina orders for custody must be based on what arrangement will promote the best interest and welfare of the child.

While custody cases in the past used to favor the mother based on the since-abolished tender years doctrine, current custody matters do not give automatic preference to one parent over another. Instead, courts must consider relevant factors like the child’s safety.

Aguilar v. Mayen