Articles Posted in Alimony Tax

Published on:

Milbourne v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo. 2015-13, 2015 WL 393040 (2015)

(a)  Facts: A husband and his wife separated. She proposed a separation agreement, which required him to pay $6,000 per month in alimony. The husband refused to sign this agreement, as he did not want to pay more than $2,500 per month in alimony.

The parties could not agree upon an amount of support and no agreement was initially signed. While the parties were negotiating, the husband paid the wife $36,000 in monthly payments of varying amounts, usually $2,000 but sometimes $4,000 or $5,000. After a total $36,000 had been paid, the parties signed an agreement calling for support of $4,500 per month, with certain possible future reductions.

Continue reading →

Published on:

Iglicki v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo. 2015-80, 2015 WL 1886010 (2015)

(a)  Facts: A Maryland separation agreement required a husband to pay $735 per month in child support to a wife. If the husband defaulted on child support, he would immediately become liable for $1,000 per month in spousal support. Liability would continue until the wife died, the husband died, or the husband made 36 payments. The agreement was incorporated into a Maryland divorce decree.

The husband defaulted on child support and thereby became liable for spousal support. The husband’s wages were eventually garnished by a Colorado court. He took an alimony deduction for the total amount paid. The IRS disallowed the alimony deduction and assessed a deficiency

(b)  Issue: Was the husband entitled to an alimony deduction? Continue reading →

Published on:

Watch out for those hurried, last minute North Carolina agreements that link alimony and child support termination; you could get an unintended tax consequence and the loss of the tax deduction.

While the Johnson case, discussed herein, is not a North Carolina case, it could be.  Guys and gals, you simply cannot link alimony reductions to a child-related event.  It doesn’t work; that is, if you want the deduction.

Continue reading →

Published on:

It is tempting to lump child support and post separation support/alimony into a bucket of one dollar amount, sometimes referred to as “family support”.  This is particularly tempting in the early part of a case, but it is DANGEROUS.  A couple of tax rules will help:

Rule 1:  Don’t create family support as a way to get 100 percent of support as an alimony deduction as this really doesn’t work.

Continue reading →

Published on:

North Carolina alimony statutes and state case law make technicalities on the “death” element of alimony under federal tax law difficult, and one needs to exercise extreme care when drafting a private alimony agreement or contract in North Carolina.

Unlike many states, all alimony awards in North Carolina are not court orders.  For legitimate strategic reasons, alimony awards are frequently private contracts in North Carolina.  Generally, one cannot modify a contractual award of alimony, but court orders for alimony may be modifiable upon a change in circumstances.  That scares many payors in North Carolina, so they negotiate for a private contract.

Continue reading →

Published on:

          Schilling v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo. 2012‑256, 2012 WL 3848477 (2012)

(a) Facts: The parties settled their divorce case by signing a separation agreement. The agreement awarded the wife $2,450 per month on spousal support for six years.  It, further, provided that the wife’s spousal support would drop by specified amounts when each of their three remaining minor children reached age 18 or left home for college, whichever occurred first.  Finally, the agreement provided that the husband would pay no child support, justifying this downward deviation from the child support guidelines by pointing to the spousal support provision. The agreement was incorporated into an Ohio divorce decree.

The husband paid support as required.  On her federal tax returns, the wife reported no alimony income.  The IRS determined that the total amount of the payments, minus the total reductions upon emancipation of the children, was actually alimony, and therefore should have been reported as income.  It, therefore, assessed a deficiency.  The wife appealed to the Tax Court. Continue reading →