Articles Posted in CPAVille

Published on:

Retirement funds can be distributed between spouses as part of property distribution during divorce, and this includes naming one ex-spouse the beneficiary of the other’s survivor pension benefits. In some cases, this process is fairly straightforward; the beneficiary receives the survivor benefits upon the death of the pension plan participant. If the participant remarries, the divorce decree or separation agreement is likely not enough to override statutory guidelines for distributing survivor’s benefits. Continue reading →

Published on:

Qualified Domestic Relations Orders (QDROs) award retirement benefits to someone who is not the owner or payee of the plan. This person is called the alternate payee, and they are often spouses and ex-spouses. Retirement benefits can be considered marital property and divided in equitable distribution during divorce proceedings. However, since some divorces can take years to finalize, there are many considerations for property distribution, including the death of either spouse. Continue reading →

Published on:

Among the most complex issues involved in divorce cases is the distribution of retirement benefits through the entry of Qualified Domestic Relations Orders (QDROs). Retirement plans that are governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) must be divided by QDROs, and alternate payees of such plans can be spouses, ex-spouses, or dependents of the plan participant.

When the participant dies before retirement, their surviving spouse is often the recipient of their retirement benefits. However, distributing funds in these circumstances can quickly become a challenge if there are multiple parties with claims to the funds and there is no QDRO in place. Continue reading →

Published on:

A Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) is an order that awards one person the right to receive some or all of another person’s retirement benefits. The person whose retirement account is being divided is known as the participant, and the person receiving the rights to the benefits is called the alternate payee. QDROs are common in divorces because retirement plans are often assets divided in equitable distribution or other distribution of property. Continue reading →

Published on:

Qualified Domestic Relations Orders (QDROs) are used to divide certain retirement plans and award a portion of the funds to an alternate payee. QDROs are typically used as part of the distribution of assets and property in a divorce, and the alternate payee is typically a spouse or former spouse. However, there are other scenarios in which a QDRO may be used to give someone rights to a retirement plan as an alternate payee. Continue reading →

Published on:

Divorce decrees often include terms regarding the division of property, like bank accounts and real estate, but these court orders do not always have the authority to distribute every asset. Typically, a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) must be used to divide and distribute rights to pension funds and certain other retirement accounts. Continue reading →

Published on:

In the case of Hopkins v. AT&T Global Information Solutions Co., the U.S. District Court ruled on cross-motions for summary judgment. The main issue in this matter was regarding the award of surviving spouse benefits to a former spouse rather than a current spouse. Continue reading →

Published on:

Filing taxes can be complicated in the best of situations, but when there are complex factors involved, like financial control by one spouse, the outcome is not always equitable. The Internal Revenue Code Section 6015 provides a remedy for some spouses facing tax deficiencies, but there are strict qualifications for entitlement under this section. Continue reading →

Published on:

North Carolina spouses who file federal taxes jointly are typically liable for the taxes that are due when they file. This may create issues and complications in a number of scenarios, but there is an exception to this rule if one spouse seeks to be relieved from liability.

Requesting equitable relief under the Internal Revenue Code can be challenging because taxpayers must meet specific conditions to be eligible.

LaRosa v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue