Published on:

Ask Carolyn: What is the Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act?

Carolyn Woodruff

Dear Carolyn,

I am the father of two children, ages 10 and 12.  The mother of the children lives in West Virginia, where she moved after our divorce. The children were born and always have lived in North Carolina. The North Carolina order for custody allows the children to travel to West Virginia for 5 weeks in the summer. Last year the mother did not return the children when she was supposed to at the end of the summer, and the court here held mother in contempt. She filed for custody in West Virginia last summer claiming fictitious abuse of one child, but that case in West Virginia was dismissed. Then, I got them back. I heard that this might be kidnapping under some federal law. Can you explain kidnapping and whether I have any right with regard to kidnapping if this happens this summer?

– Frustrated and Looking for Options

 

Dear Frustrated,

With regard to parental kidnapping, I think you are referring to the federal law for Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act (PKPA), 28 USC section 1738A. The PKPA is frequently not well understood. The PKPA was enacted to resolve jurisdiction conflicts in child custody cases.

Clearly, North Carolina retains jurisdiction of your case and the mother should not have filed in West Virginia; that filing was frivolous. Essentially, under the PKPA, North Carolina is the “home state” of the children because of the existing custody order in North Carolina. Home state was established because the children lived here six months before the case began.

In addition to home state jurisdiction, the PKPA has three other types of jurisdiction:  1) significant connection; 2) emergency; and 3) more appropriate forum. Since there is a home state (North Carolina), significant connection and more appropriate forum absolutely do not apply under the PKPA. Thus, the only other jurisdiction to consider is emergency.

You state not facts that make me think that West Virginia could get custody jurisdiction under the PKPA for emergency reasons, and I have seen this tried in certain cases. In order to have emergency jurisdiction under the PKPA, the mother would have to allege that the children were 1) abandoned; 2) a child have been subjected to or threatened with mistreatment or abuse; or 3) a sibling or parent of the child had been subjected to or threatened with mistreatment or abuse. It is usually the false abuse allegation that creates the temporary problem in the other state (non-home state). This is what temporarily happened in your situation.

Please note that most interstate custody disputes are resolved under the Uniform Child-Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, which North Carolina has adopted, which is similar to the PKPA. The PKPA is there if you need it, however.

 

Have Family Law Questions?

Send them to Ask Carolyn! Submit questions through the Ask Carolyn website, direct message Carolyn on social media (Twitter & Facebook), email askcarolyn@rhinotimes.com, or mail your questions to P.O. Box 9023, Greensboro, NC  27427.  Please do not put identifying information in your questions.

Note that the answers in “Ask Carolyn” are intended to provide general legal information, and the answers are not specific legal advice for your situation.  The column also uses hypothetical questions.  A subtle fact in your unique case may determine the legal advice you need in your unique case.  Also, please note that you are not creating an attorney-client relationship with Carolyn J. Woodruff by writing or having your question answered by “Ask Carolyn.”


This blog is an excerpt from Ask Carolyn, now available on Kindle.