A North Carolina Court of Appeals decision in the Face v. Face (2024) case addressed many key points in separation court proceedings, including equitable distribution and alimony, as well as procedural issues such as subject-matter jurisdiction and correction of clerical errors in domestic law. Continue reading →
Nobody gets married thinking they will one day be sitting in a courtroom, arguing over who is better fit to take care of the kids. However, in cases where relationships fail, family courts focus primarily on determining which parent can truly give their children a secure and stable home. Continue reading →
The 2024 Sunshine v. Sunshine decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals clarified how courts should handle income imputation in divorce cases. Continue reading →
There are numerous factors courts must consider when making custody and visitation determinations, but the preeminent factor is the best interest of the child. In some cases, courts may weigh the child’s preference as part of their overall considerations, but this is handled on a case-by-case basis. The child’s age, maturity, and ability to understand the implications of such a decision may impact a court’s willingness to consider the child’s preferences. Continue reading →
Wasting a court’s time and resources can lead to hefty fines and other penalties for parties who file bad faith complaints. Attorney fees are often awarded in cases where the court determines the plaintiff or other moving party filed their claim in bad faith. Continue reading →
Most divorces involve some level of property distribution, including tangible and intangible items like furniture, vehicles, houses, bank accounts, and retirement accounts. Spouses who own businesses may also be required to divide the value of their business as part of an equitable distribution order. Continue reading →
Courts must have jurisdiction to hear a case. Jurisdiction can be established in numerous ways, including by subject matter or geography. If a party to a case wants to appeal a ruling, the court of appeals must ensure they have appellate jurisdiction, which is the authority to review a lower court’s decision. Interlocutory appeals present unique challenges when determining appellate jurisdiction because there are strict rules concerning the types of orders and judgments that can be appealed, such as whether or not the appealed ruling is considered final. Continue reading →
Divorcing spouses are not guaranteed to receive an equal distribution of their marital assets and debts. If either spouse requests equitable distribution, the court will divide their property in a way that is determined to be fair, which isn’t always 50/50. Continue reading →
North Carolina law allows modification of alimony orders based on changed circumstances of either party, paying or receiving alimony. The same factors used for establishing alimony awards must also be used when determining whether to modify an award. These factors include marital misconduct, the relative earnings and earning capacities of each party, their health, their sources of income, the assets and liabilities of each party, and their relative needs. Continue reading →
North Carolina law states that it is presumed that all property acquired between the date of marriage and separation is considered marital property, which includes business interests. When determining the value of businesses, goodwill is often a component of the valuation. This includes intangible assets like brand reputation, intellectual property, customer relationships, and future earning potential. While goodwill is challenging to quantify, it does have value and marketability. Continue reading →
North Carolina Divorce Lawyers Blog