Determining how military benefits should be awarded to spouses and former spouses after the death of a servicemember is complex and based on a variety of factors, including the date and manner of the servicemember’s death and which military benefit is in question. Continue reading →
Divorcing spouses are not guaranteed to receive an equal distribution of their marital assets and debts. If either spouse requests equitable distribution, the court will divide their property in a way that is determined to be fair, which isn’t always 50/50. Continue reading →
Retirement funds can be distributed between spouses as part of property distribution during divorce, and this includes naming one ex-spouse the beneficiary of the other’s survivor pension benefits. In some cases, this process is fairly straightforward; the beneficiary receives the survivor benefits upon the death of the pension plan participant. If the participant remarries, the divorce decree or separation agreement is likely not enough to override statutory guidelines for distributing survivor’s benefits. Continue reading →
Qualified Domestic Relations Orders (QDROs) award retirement benefits to someone who is not the owner or payee of the plan. This person is called the alternate payee, and they are often spouses and ex-spouses. Retirement benefits can be considered marital property and divided in equitable distribution during divorce proceedings. However, since some divorces can take years to finalize, there are many considerations for property distribution, including the death of either spouse. Continue reading →
Equitable distribution can be requested in North Carolina divorces, which means the court will determine the fairest way to divide assets and debts rather than dividing property evenly. The presumption is typically that any property acquired during marriage is considered marital property and therefore is subject to equitable distribution. However, there are exceptions such as inheritance and certain gifts. Continue reading →
When the world’s third-richest person delays his wedding, people pay attention. Not just to the glitz and guest list, but to the legal mechanics behind the scenes.
North Carolina law states that it is presumed that all property acquired between the date of marriage and separation is considered marital property, which includes business interests. When determining the value of businesses, goodwill is often a component of the valuation. This includes intangible assets like brand reputation, intellectual property, customer relationships, and future earning potential. While goodwill is challenging to quantify, it does have value and marketability. Continue reading →
A Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) is an order that awards one person the right to receive some or all of another person’s retirement benefits. The person whose retirement account is being divided is known as the participant, and the person receiving the rights to the benefits is called the alternate payee. QDROs are common in divorces because retirement plans are often assets divided in equitable distribution or other distribution of property. Continue reading →
North Carolina spouses who file federal taxes jointly are typically liable for the taxes that are due when they file. This may create issues and complications in a number of scenarios, but there is an exception to this rule if one spouse seeks to be relieved from liability.
Requesting equitable relief under the Internal Revenue Code can be challenging because taxpayers must meet specific conditions to be eligible.
For spouses and ex-spouses facing economic hardship and seeking equitable relief from joint and several tax liability, filing a request for relief under federal law may be an option. The Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) provides an exception to the usual rule that spouses are liable for each other’s tax debt and liabilities, but filers must provide convincing evidence that they are facing an economic hardship if they choose that route for relief.
In the case of Thomas v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Thomas requested relief from underpayments for three years of tax returns based on her assertion that she was facing an economic hardship. Thomas sought liability relief for tax underpayments discovered by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for tax years 2012 through 2014, but Commissioner denied the request. When the issue went before the United States Tax Court, the Court denied Thomas’ request for equitable relief based on economic hardship under Internal Revenue Code Section 6015(f) because she had significant assets and did not prove hardship based on her income.
North Carolina Divorce Lawyers Blog