Tax Evasion and Asset Transfer Between Spouses
In Cotroneo v. Commissioner the Commissioner of Internal Revenue determined that Cotroneo and her husband had a tax deficiency of $15,288 and a penalty of $3,058. Continue reading →
In Cotroneo v. Commissioner the Commissioner of Internal Revenue determined that Cotroneo and her husband had a tax deficiency of $15,288 and a penalty of $3,058. Continue reading →
Assets like real estate and bank accounts may be the first types of property to come to mind when thinking about equitable distribution in divorce cases, but debts can also be distributed in North Carolina divorces. In the case of Read v. Read, Husband was ordered to pay a percentage of Wife’s student loans because a large portion of the loans were used to cover living expenses for the spouses and their children while Wife was in school. Continue reading →
Equitable distribution is part of a North Carolina divorce if one or both of the spouses request it. This process allows marital property to be divided in a way that is fair and just, and there is no standard division template. Each case is unique, and property and debts will be distributed based on the evidence presented to the judge. Continue reading →
Gray divorce—the decision to end a marriage later in life—is increasingly common among couples aged 50 and older. In our previous blog, we explored the gray divorce of Bill and Melinda Gates, focusing on mutual respect and discretion during the process. In this installment, we’ll look at the divorce of Rupert Murdoch and Wendi Deng, a split that offers unique insights into the importance of financial independence and planning when navigating gray divorce. Continue reading →
Equitable distribution in North Carolina can involve numerous types of marital property and hybrid property, including real estate, bank accounts, investments, vehicles, and personal property like jewelry. Retirement accounts are also a common asset that courts are asked to divide in divorces, but distributing certain retirement plans comes with complex legal requirements. Continue reading →
How to divide marital assets and property is one of the most hotly-contested aspects in divorce proceedings, and the principal of equitable distribution governs the process of this division. While dividing up assets like a house, car, or other tangible property may seem simple enough, there are other assets like a retirement account or trust fund that may be subject to equitable distribution as well. Continue reading →
In the intricate world of family law, the equitable distribution of assets during a divorce can often lead to contentious disputes. A notable example is the case of Roberts v. Kyle, Executor of the Estate of Roberts. This case sheds light on the challenges courts face when determining the classification of personal vs. marital property in the context of divorce proceedings. Continue reading →
Bankruptcy can complicate family law proceedings, especially when trying to determine what assets will be distributed. Normally, bankruptcy can be used to shield certain properties from being included in divorce proceedings. However, certain types of assets will not be excluded because of one spouse declaring bankruptcy.
If your former partner declares bankruptcy during divorce proceedings, will that preclude you from being able to recover an interest in their pension benefits? Continue reading →
When trial courts enter orders in family law matters, such as alimony orders or equitable distribution orders, either party may appeal as long as they meet the requirements. There are various stipulations, such as rules about appealing interlocutory or temporary orders, but the general rule is that orders entered by trial courts are appealable if done at the right time.
Once an appeal has been filed and noted, can the court that entered the appealed order issue other orders in the same matter?
As part of the North Carolina divorce process, spouses often have assets that need to be divided between them. Equitable distribution is an option if one or both spouses request it, and it is the process by which the court will divide the property in a way that is equitable but not always equal. Continue reading →