Close

Articles Posted in tax

Updated:

A Gift by Any Other Name is Still a Gift in the Court’s Eyes (Hughes v. Comm’r)

By: Dana M. Horlick, Attorney, Woodruff Family Law Group

Hughes v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo. 2015-89, 2015 WL 2180505 (2015) (a) Facts: A husband owned stock in a consulting business that was growing in value. He was afraid that if he retained the stock, his former wife would seek to reopen their divorce decree. He therefore gave the stock to his…

Updated:

Pay On Time and in Cash or You Can Forget About that Alimony Deduction (Muniz v. Comm’r)

By: Dana M. Horlick, Attorney, Woodruff Family Law Group

Muniz v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo. 2015-125, 2015 WL 4126356 (2015) (a) Facts: A Florida separation agreement provided that the husband would pay wife $1,000 per month in alimony. The husband did not pay on time, and the court entered an enforcement order directing the husband to pay $6,000 in alimony due under…

Updated:

Alimony, Separation Agreements, and Attorney Fees: 2015 Tax Court (Milbourne v. Comm’r)

Milbourne v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo. 2015-13, 2015 WL 393040 (2015) (a)  Facts: A husband and his wife separated. She proposed a separation agreement, which required him to pay $6,000 per month in alimony. The husband refused to sign this agreement, as he did not want to pay more than $2,500 per…

Updated:

Alimony Arrearages and Federal Tax Consequences (Iglicki v. Comm’r)

Iglicki v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo. 2015-80, 2015 WL 1886010 (2015) (a)  Facts: A Maryland separation agreement required a husband to pay $735 per month in child support to a wife. If the husband defaulted on child support, he would immediately become liable for $1,000 per month in spousal support. Liability…

Updated:

Divisible Property in Equitable Distribution

North Carolina General Statutes Section 50-20(b) (4) defines divisible property. Divisible property covers certain values created post-separation. A husband that continued to work in a dental practice post-separation did not create active appreciation.   Husband did not change anything about his business methods to increase business. The growth between the date…

Updated:

A Lost Alimony Deduction by Linking to Child Support

Watch out for those hurried, last minute North Carolina agreements that link alimony and child support termination; you could get an unintended tax consequence and the loss of the tax deduction. While the Johnson case, discussed herein, is not a North Carolina case, it could be.  Guys and gals, you…

Updated:

Technicalities on “Death Termination” for Alimony Deduction (Wignall v. Comm’r)

by Carolyn J. Woodruff, JD, CPA, CVA

North Carolina alimony statutes and state case law make technicalities on the “death” element of alimony under federal tax law difficult, and one needs to exercise extreme care when drafting a private alimony agreement or contract in North Carolina. Unlike many states, all alimony awards in North Carolina are not…

Updated:

So the Wife ends up in Tax Court for Mixing Alimony and Child Support…Don’t Do This! (Schilling v. Comm’r)

by Carolyn J. Woodruff, JD, CPA, CVA

Schilling v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo. 2012‑256, 2012 WL 3848477 (2012) (a) Facts: The parties settled their divorce case by signing a separation agreement. The agreement awarded the wife $2,450 per month on spousal support for six years.  It, further, provided that the wife’s spousal support would drop by specified amounts…

Updated:

A Summary on Current law regarding Innocent Spouse and Thoughts on how this affects a North Carolina Divorce : Part 4 of 4 Parts

By Carolyn J. Woodruff, JD, CPA, CVA

This article is part 4 of a series of articles regarding Innocent Spouse.  This final blog on the basics of the current Innocent Spouse tax law will do two things:  1) summarize changes discussed in the first three articles; 2) give some practical guidance to attorneys, CPAs, and clients in…

Updated:

Requirements for Discretionary Innocent Spouse Relief : Part 3 of 4 Parts

by Carolyn J. Woodruff, JD, CPA, CVA

Part 3 of a 4-Part Series on Innocent Spouse Basics (a) The Former Requirements: Rev. Proc. 2003-61, 2003‑32 I.R.B. 296, 2003 WL 21708514 (Aug. 11, 2003) (b) The New Requirements: Rev. Proc. 2013-34, 2013‑43 I.R.B. 397, 2013 WL 5179241 (Oct. 21, 2013) (1) This is the new Revenue Procedure setting…

Contact Us